¿Existe concordancia entre vejiga hiperactiva e hiperactividad del detrusor en varones con síntomas predominantemente de llenado derivados a Unidades de Urología Funcional y Urodinámica? / Is there concordance between overactive bladder and detrusor overactivity in men with predominant storage urinary symptoms referred to Functional Urology and Urodynamics Units?

Objetivo Estudiar el grado de concordancia diagnóstica entre vejiga hiperactiva (VH) e hiperactividad del detrusor (HD) en varones con síntomas del tracto urinario inferior (STUI) predominantemente de llenado, y el perfil clínico y urodinámico según presencia de HD y grado de obstrucción del tracto urinario inferior (OTUI).Material y métodos Estudio epidemiológico, transversal, multicéntrico y nacional. Se cumplimentaron: diario miccional de 3 días (DM3d), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) y Cuestionario de Autoevaluación del Control de la Vejiga (CACV). Se determinó el volumen prostático (Vp) por ecografía y se realizó estudio urodinámico (EUD). Se analizó la prevalencia de VH y HD y la concordancia (kappa). Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de características clínicas y urodinámicas; posteriormente se comparó su frecuencia según presencia de HD y OTUI.ResultadosSe evaluaron 445 pacientes con edad media±DE de 54,8±9,9 años. Según el DM3d, un 89,8% presentaba frecuencia miccional aumentada, un 87,9% nicturia, un 72,8% urgencia y un 31,9% incontinencia urinaria de urgencia (IUU). Un 36,8% tenía OTUI. El 54,5% presentaba VH y HD. La concordancia diagnóstica entre HD y VH fue baja (κ=0,1702). Más pacientes con HD que sin ella presentaron urgencia (DM3d y CACV; p<0,001), IUU (DM3d; p=0,008) y nicturia (CACV; p<0,001). Hubo diferencias en IPSS-vaciado, flujo máximo (Qmax) y residuo posmiccional (p<0,05) según el grado de obstrucción.ConclusionesEn pacientes varones de 18 a 65 años con STUI predominantemente de llenado derivados a unidades especializadas, aproximadamente la mitad tienen coexistencia de VH y HD y un tercio tenía obstrucción. Hay baja concordancia diagnóstica entre VH y HD (AU)

Objective To assess the diagnostic concordance of overactive bladder (OAB) and detrusor overactivity (DO) in male patients with predominant storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and evaluate their clinical and urodynamic profile according to DO presence and degree of obstruction.Material and methods Epidemiological, cross-sectional multicenter study. A 3-day bladder diary (3dBD), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Bladder Control Self-Assessment Questionnaire (B-SAQ) questionnaires were analyzed. Prostate volume was determined by ultrasound. Urodynamic study (UDS) tests were performed. The prevalence of OAB and DO and the degree of clinical concordance (kappa index) were investigated. Descriptive analysis of clinical variables and UDS results was performed, followed by comparisons based on the presence of DO and degree of obstruction.ResultsA total of 445 patients were included. The mean age was (SD) 54.8 (9.9) years. According to 3dBD, 89.9% presented increased urinary frequency, 87.9% nocturia, 72.1% urgency, and 31.9% urge urinary incontinence (UUI). Obstruction was present in 36.8%. Concomitant OAB and DO were present in 54.5%. The degree of diagnostic concordance between OAB and DO was low (κ=0.1772). There were more patients with DO presenting urgency (3dBD and B-SAQ; p<0.001), UUI (3dBD; p=0.008) and nocturia (B-SAQ; p<0.001). Differences were found in terms of prostate volume, IPSS-voiding, maximum flow (Qmax) and post-void residual (p<0.05) according to the obstruction degree.ConclusionsApproximately 50% of male patients aged 18-65 years old with predominant storage LUTS, referred to specialized units, have both OAB and DO. Obstruction is present on 1/3. Diagnostic concordance between OAB and DO is poor (AU)

Is there concordance between overactive bladder and detrusor overactivity in men with predominant storage urinary symptoms referred to Functional Urology and Urodynamics Units?

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic concordance of overactive bladder (OAB) and detrusor overactivity (DO) in male patients with predominant storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and evaluate their clinical and urodynamic profile according to DO presence and degree of obstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Epidemiological, cross-sectional multicenter study. A 3-day bladder diary (3dBD), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Bladder Control Self-Assessment Questionnaire (B-SAQ) questionnaires were analyzed. Prostate volume was determined by ultrasound. Urodynamic study (UDS) tests were performed. The prevalence of OAB and DO and the degree of clinical concordance (kappa index) were investigated. Descriptive analysis of clinical variables and UDS results was performed, followed by comparisons based on the presence of DO and degree of obstruction. RESULTS: A total of 445 patients were included. The mean age was (SD) 54.8 (9.9) years. According to 3dBD, 89.9% presented increased urinary frequency, 87.9% nocturia, 72.1% urgency, and 31.9% urge urinary incontinence (UUI). Obstruction was present in 36.8%. Concomitant OAB and DO were present in 54.5%. The degree of diagnostic concordance between OAB and DO was low (κ = 0.1772). There were more patients with DO presenting urgency (3dBD and B-SAQ; p < 0.001), UUI (3dBD; p = 0.008) and nocturia (B-SAQ; p < 0.001). Differences were found in terms of prostate volume, IPSS-voiding, maximum flow (Qmax) and post-void residual (p < 0.05) according to the obstruction degree. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 50% of male patients aged 18-65 years old with predominant storage LUTS, referred to specialized units, have both OAB and DO. Obstruction is present on 1/3. Diagnostic concordance between OAB and DO is poor.

Is there concordance between overactive bladder and detrusor overactivity in men with predominant storage urinary symptoms referred to Functional Urology and Urodynamics Units? / ¿Existe concordancia entre vejiga hiperactiva e hiperactividad del detrusor en varones con síntomas predominantemente de llenado derivados a Unidades de Urología Funcional y Urodinámica?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic concordance of overactive bladder (OAB) and detrusor overactivity (DO) in male patients with predominant storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and evaluate their clinical and urodynamic profile according to DO presence and degree of obstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Epidemiological, cross-sectional multicenter study. A 3-day bladder diary (3dBD), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Bladder Control Self-Assessment Questionnaire (B-SAQ) questionnaires were analyzed. Prostate volume was determined by ultrasound. Urodynamic study (UDS) tests were performed. The prevalence of OAB and DO and the degree of clinical concordance (kappa index) were investigated. Descriptive analysis of clinical variables and UDS results was performed, followed by comparisons based on the presence of DO and degree of obstruction. RESULTS: A total of 445 patients were included. The mean age was (SD) 54.8 (9.9) years. According to 3dBD, 89.9% presented increased urinary frequency, 87.9% nocturia, 72.1% urgency, and 31.9% urge urinary incontinence (UUI). Obstruction was present in 36.8%. Concomitant OAB and DO were present in 54.5%. The degree of diagnostic concordance between OAB and DO was low (κ=0.1772). There were more patients with DO presenting urgency (3dBD and B-SAQ; p<0.001), UUI (3dBD; p=0.008) and nocturia (B-SAQ; p<0.001). Differences were found in terms of prostate volume, IPSS-voiding, maximum flow (Qmax) and post-void residual (p<0.05) according to the obstruction degree. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 50% of male patients aged 18-65 years old with predominant storage LUTS, referred to specialized units, have both OAB and DO. Obstruction is present on 1/3. Diagnostic concordance between OAB and DO is poor.

Consensus statement of the Spanish Association Of Urology on the use of meshes in pelvic organ prolapse. / Consenso de la Asociación Española de Urología sobre el uso de mallas en la cirugía del prolapso de órganos pélvicos.

INTRODUCTION: Recently the Food and Drug Administration has banned the use of transvaginal meshes for the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in the United States. This has caused a worldwide impact on the management of pelvic floor pathology by different specialists. OBJECTIVE: To achieve a consensus on the use of meshes in the surgical treatment of POPs. ACQUISITION OF DATA/EVIDENCE: A Committee of experts of the Spanish Association of Urology (AEU) was organized to review the literature and analyze the safety and efficacy of the use of polypropylene meshes in POP surgery. RESULTS/EVIDENCE FROM THE LITERATURE: The evidence reflects that the use of meshes, compared to the use of native tissues, offers better efficacy at the expense of new complications and a higher rate of surgical reviews, these being minor in the hands of expert surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: POP surgery must be performed by experienced surgeons, properly trained and in referral centers. The patient should receive correct information about the different treatment options. Transvaginal meshes should only be indicated in complex cases and in recurrences after POP surgery. AEU PROPOSAL: Creation of a clinical guideline and a national registry for long-term evaluation. Preparation of an Informed Consent available to all professionals and patients, as well as a specific training plan to achieve better training in complex pelvic floor surgery.

Assessment of the psychometric properties of the Spanish language version of questionnaire ICIQ-Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-MLUTS).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the ICIQ-Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Questionnaire (ICIQ-MLUTS): Feasibility (% of completion and ceiling/ground effects), reliability (Test-retest), convergent validity (vs Bladder Control Self-Assessment Questionnaire [BSAQ] and vs International Prostate Symptom Score [I-PSS]) and criterion validity (according to presence or absence of symptoms). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was an observational, non-interventionist and multicenter study. 223 male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), predominantly storage symptoms and aged 18-65, took part in the study. Patients completed the ICIQ-MLUTS (test), I-PSS and BSAQ questionnaires and referred their urinary symptoms in a single visit, with the exception of a subgroup composed by 49 patients that completed the questionnaire again 15 days after initial visit to evaluate test-retest reliability. The questionnaire includes 13 items divided in 2 sub-scales: Voiding symptoms (V) from 0-20 and Incontinence symptoms (I) from 0-24. RESULTS: Percentage of patients that completed all items: 98.84%. Ground effect is 0 and ceiling effect was under 6% in both sub-scales. Test-retest reliability: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranged from 0.68 to 0.88, except on Delay. Kappa shows a good agreement, between 0.60 and 0.81, except for Nocturia. Convergent validity: Correlation (Spearman) between the questionnaire sub-scales scores and the rest of measures is statistically significant (P < .01 and P < .05). Criterion validity: Statistically significant differences (P < .05) between scores on ICIQ-MLUTS, from patients that refer experiencing symptoms and those who do not. CONCLUSION: The Spanish version of the ICIQ-MLUTS questionnaire shows adequate feasibility, reliability and validity.

[Isolated intraepithelial prostatic neoplasia and positive prostate adenocarcinoma results at repeated biopsy. Review of our series]. / Neoplasia intraepitelial prostática aislada y positividad para adenocarcinoma en la rebiopsia. Revision de nuestra serie.

OBJECTIVE: To review the incidence of isolated prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) as well as the positive prostate cancer results in repeat biopsy in our series of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. We compare these results with the actual literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We review the 2.475 transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies of the prostate made in our department from January 1992 to June 2004 looking for intraepithelial neoplasia and looking in particular for isolated High-grade PIN (HGPIN). We review repeat biopsies made at this patients and the likelihood of detecting prostate cancer in them. RESULTS: The diagnosis of PIN was found in 31 biopsies, 13 of them were isolated HGPIN what means a 0.52% incidence of the total biopsies performed in our department. We performed 7 repeat biopsies of the 13 cases in a period from 3 months to 2 years after the first biopsy, and we found 3 cases of prostate cancer what means that 43% of isolated HGPIN with repeated biopsy showed prostate cancer. The mean age of the patients studied was 67 years (range 53-88). The median PSA value of the studied cases was 9.8 ng/ml. The Gleason score of the positive biopsies was always between 3 and 7. In our series, age and PSA levels did not have correlation with the positive results for prostate cancer in repeated biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of a lower number of HGPIN cases in our series, the positive for prostate cancer in repeated biopsy (43%) is similar to the incidence reported in literature so it is advisable rigorous controls and repeated biopsies for these patients.

Neoplasia intraepitelial prostática aislada y positividad para adenocarcinoma en la rebiopsia. Revisión de nuestra serie / Isolated prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and positive prostate cancer results at repeat biopsy. Our series review

Objetivo: Revisar la incidencia de neoplasia intraepitelial prostática ( PIN ) aislada, así como la positividad para adenocarcinomaprostático de estas lesiones en la rebiopsia en nuestra serie de biopsias transrectales, comparando los resultados con la bibliografía actual. Material y Método : Hemos analizado las 2.475 biopsias prostáticas transrectales ecodirigidas realizadas en nuestro Servicio desde enero de 1992 hasta junio del 2004 en búsqueda de neoplasia intraepitelial prostática y en concreto de PIN de alto grado (PINAG) aislado, revisando las rebiopsias realizadas a estos pacientes y la probabilidad de detectar en ellas adenocarcinoma. Resultados: De un total de 31 biopsias en las que se halló el diagnóstico de PIN, 13 de ellas corresponde a PIN de alto grado aislado, lo que supone una incidencia de 0,52% del total de las biopsias realizadas en el Servicio. Se han rebiopsiado7 de estos 13 casos en un período de 3 meses a 2 años tras la primera biopsia, hallando en 3 adenocarcinoma; lo que supone que el 43 % de los PINAG aislados rebiopsiados en la serie mostraron adenocarcinoma. La edad media de los pacientes estudiados fue de 67 años (rango 53-88). El PSA medio de los pacientes estudiados fue de 9,8 ng/ml. El Gleason de las biopsias con carcinoma estuvo siempre entre 3 y 7. En nuestra muestra, la edad y los niveles de PSA no guardaban relación con la positividad a adenocarcinoma en las rebiopsias. Conclusiones: A pesar de una cifra inferior de PIN de alto grado en nuestra serie, la positividad para carcinoma en la rebiopsia (43%) es semejante a la descrita en la literatura, por lo que son aconsejables los controles rigurosos y las rebiopsias a estos pacientes (AU)

Objetive: To review the incidence of isolated prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) as well as the positive prostate cancer results in repeat biopsy in our series of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. We compare these results with the actual literature. Materials and Methods: We review the 2.475 transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies of the prostate made in our department from January 1992 to June 2004 looking for intraepithelial neoplasia and looking in particular for isolated High-grade PIN (HGPIN). We review repeat biopsies made at this patients and the likelihood of detecting prostate cancer in them. Results: The diagnosis of PIN was found in 31 biopsies, 13 of them were isolated HGPIN what means a 0,52% incidence of the total biopsies performed in our department. We performed 7 repeat biopsies of the 13 cases in a period from3 months to 2 years after the first biopsy, and we found 3 cases of prostate cancer what means that 43% of isolated HGPIN with repeated biopsy showed prostate cancer. The mean age of the patients studied was 67 years (range 53-88).The median PSA value of the studied cases was 9,8 ng /ml. The Gleason score of the positive biopsies was always between3 and 7. In our series, age and PSA levels did not have correlation with the positive results for prostate cancer in repeated biopsies. Conclusions: In spite of a lower number of HGPIN cases in our series, the positive for prostate cancer in repeated biopsy ( 43%) is similar to the incidence reported in literature so it is advisable rigorous controls and repeated biopsies for these patients (AU)